������

Program

Congress Theme

Challenges of Contemporary Governance

Political scientists are often seen not merely as analysts of political matters, but as something akin to engineers sculpting the organisation of power.

Globalisation has profoundly altered the work of political scientists, intensifying communication and exchange on issues pertaining to the way in which communities, societies, nations and the world itself are governed.

The ambition of this international political science congress, to be held in Montreal, is to reflect upon contemporary evolutions in governance in the face of numerous challenges:

• Political, economic and social systems have become increasingly fragmented, rendering global strategic initiatives ever more complex
• The variety of values, attitudes and behaviours exhibited by individuals and groups makes for a greater and more diverse demand for inclusion and participation
• As the structures through which these interests are represented continue to expand, systems of governance become increasingly complex, more difficult to interpret and understand and less responsive to the uninitiated citizen
• There is a growing risk that the democratic quality of our political systems will deteriorate as a result of the rising influence and decision-making capacity of technical-administrative and technocratic experts
• For a given sector or type of organisation, comparative analysis and an experimental methodological approach should help better evaluate the performance of different forms of governance
• It may also be fruitful to focus on the various competitive strategies and means by which models of governance are promoted, or even imposed (in the name of ‘good governance’ demanded by international institutions, for example)

Faced with these challenges, the multi-faceted phenomenon of governance requires a global, comprehensive and multi-tiered approach: from the local association or political party up to the international community, via regional integration or the national regulation of an economic sector.
Adopting an approach to political science which is resolutely open to the opportunities offered by interdisciplinary collaborations, we must also support the circulation of theoretical frameworks and empirical approaches which are applicable in the northern and southern hemispheres, to the most developed nations and the panoply of emerging and developing countries.

The main focus of this congress will be to generate the greatest possible number of concrete, innovative answers to the questions of citizens, their political, associative and socio-economic representatives and the policy makers who are working constantly to improve the quality of governance.

The principal themes covered by this congress will be:

• International Political Economy
• International Relations  
• Public Policy Analysis and Administrative Science
• Comparative Politics and Institutions
• Political Theory, Gender and Politics
• Urban and Regional Politics and Policies
• Political Attitudes and Behaviour

Daily Highlights

DAY 1 - 20 July 2014

Michael Dukakis on International Security Policy

A number of interesting sessions and events were held, not least the Michael Dukakis plenary on international security policy. Before a packed plenary room, Governor Dukakis delivered an internationalist perspective on international relations, with a special focus on interstate security. He went on to address the current challenges facing the United States in its historic role as leader of the free world, as well as strained U.S. relations with some Asia/Pacific countries and Russia.

Dukakis believes the United States must play a role – albeit a different one – on the international stage. The U.S., he claims, must lead by example by accepting the expertise and competence of international institutions. The key requirements he cited for fostering greater international stability included supporting existing institutions, continuing the process of eliminating nuclear weapons, putting an end to global warfare, and renewing the focus on emerging challenges such as immigration regulation, health care and global warming. Governor Dukakis believes that institutions must be responsible for managing specific issues in order to create a more peaceful and prosperous international environment.

Opening Ceremony

Some 2000 participants attended the opening ceremony and the ensuing cocktail reception. Current ������president Helen V. Milner, Program Committee Chair Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot, ������Secretary-General Guy Lachapelle, and Chief Scientist of Quebec, Rémi Quirion, all welcomed the guests in their opening speeches. Participants were then treated to an exquisite performance by Cirque du Soleil, one of Québec’s best known institutions.

 

 

In brief...

• The connection between political finance and political corruption was addressed during the session titled Money, Corruption and Political Competition.
• The discussion on the Shia-Sunni Conflict in the Islamic World raised the issue of what constitutes a truly Islamic state, as well as the differences between secularism and sectarianism.
• What is it like to be a woman in academics? Cited here was the paradoxical situation whereby female students now outnumber their male counterparts, yet hold comparatively fewer positions as professors and administrators.
• The ambiguity in the Constitution on the status of courts has given rise to interpretation, especially concerning the nomination process.
• The relationship between diversity and trust toward immigrants in a given population was discussed in the session titled Accommodating Immigrants: Examining Local and National Governance Responses in the Era of Global Immigration.

---

DAY 2 - 21 July 2014

Rod Rhodes – Challenges of Contemporary Governance: Rediscovering the Craft of Public Administration

Leading governance expert Rod Rhodes discussed the mechanisms and processes at play in the formulation of public politics. Among his main contentions was that public reforms are often put together too hastily and are under-evaluated. The most common reflex is to criticize them without giving them enough time to prove their efficiency. He also holds that public management is the result of the punctual desires and interests of ministries, which place too much emphasis on action and decision-making rather than “keeping things going.”

Special Session – Is there a future for Belgium after 2014?

On Belgium’s National Day, a panel composed of Ruth Dassonneville, Kris Deschouwer, Pierre Verjans, Emilie Van Haute and Regis Dandoy spoke about the future of Belgium and the difficulties stemming from its lack of government. Belgium was built on dissension, they argued, reiterating the need for all groups to be represented in government. They also called into question the federal model, suggesting it may not be the best way to reconcile all parties, and argued that a volatile electorate can be a positive force in that it is an indicator of a healthy democracy.

Moscow 1979 – the 11^th ������World Congress

Kenneth Janda, Mikhail Ilyin and John Trent reminisced about the 11th World Congress of Political Science. The event is said to have greatly influenced Gorbachev’s subsequent policies. In a letter sent to Secretary General Guy Lachapelle, Mr. Gorbachev stated that the Moscow congress had deeply influenced the perestroika movement and glasnost. Participants also mentioned that holding the World Congress in Moscow at that time helped to lend legitimacy to the Soviet Union and to political science as a discipline. The 11th World Congress also welcomed Israelis and South Koreans for the first time. For Kenneth Janda, the event gave a “tip to the dark side,” with Mikhail Ilyin adding that “everything started from this small step.”

Juan Linz – The Man and his Legacy

In this special tribute session, José Ramon Montero, Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Houchang E. Chebabi, Leonardo Morlino, Francisco Llera and Yossi Shain looked back on the life and legacy of Juan Linz, with a focus on his leap into empirical analysis. They remembered his ability to differentiate between types of regimes, as well as his expertise on Southern Europe. Former students and colleagues spoke fondly about their experience with Juan Linz, while some evoked the difficulties faced by women studying politics.

Angelin Chang Concert celebrating the 38 years of RC18 – Asian and Pacific Studies

At the end of the day, participants and attendees were invited to a special concert presented by GRAMMY® Winning pianist Angelin Chang, who is also chair of RC18 on Asian Pacific Studies. Given before a packed house, the recital featured works by Bach, Chopin, Shubert and Debussy. Guests were awed by her talent and impressed by her generosity.

 

 

 

---

DAY 3 - 22 July 2014

Council Meeting – Election of the President

On Tuesday morning, Prof. Aiji Tanaka was unanimously elected new President of IPSA, succeeding Prof. Helen V. Milner. Prof. Aiji Tanaka is Senior Executive Director for Academic Affairs at Waseda University (Tokyo). His expertise lies mainly in voting behaviour and public opinion as well as Japanese politics. ������is proud to welcome Prof. Tanaka as its newly elected president, and we wish him the very best success in his new duties.

Award Session – Global South Award

Flanked by representatives from the Indian Political Science Association, Dr. Sunil Kumar, the recipient of this year’s Global South Award, presented >a lecture on electoral democracy and political demography against the backdrop of recent elections in India. Prof. Kumar, the holder of fellowships from Oxford University and Tel-Aviv University, spoke about the emerging political climate in India, which has been marked by public demands for greater accountability and transparency and more effective governance.

President’s Plenary

Outgoing President Helen V. Milner chaired the plenary titled Globalization and Domestic Political Change. The four participants – Amaney Jamal, Edward Mansfield, Nita Rudra and Lourdes Sola – discussed the changes wrought by globalization in domestic politics (in the Middle East and North Africa, the United States, India and South America) and the impact of increased trade and foreign investment. Prof. Milner explained that while developing countries now account for close to 50% of the global economy, there are still major gaps in terms of poverty and employment. Participants also looked at why some countries are not benefitting from globalization, owing to lack of foreign investment, persistent conflicts and the absence of a manufacturing sector (the Middle East), or the fear that globalization and outsourcing will lead to job losses (the United States). Three questions were raised: Will democracies persist in a globalized world? What type of leadership should we expect, and who should be exercising it? Will global governance bodies impose their own reforms or cease to exist?
 

In brief...

• In the panel titled Emerging Technologies and Civil Society, the rise of new technologies in civil society sparked questions concerning the use of private data, and the control of access to information and “political technology”.
• Experts questioned the use of shale gas, suggesting that the shale gas lobby now exerts a profound influence on political actors, though local governments have the final say on resource management given that their constituencies are directly affected by such decisions.
• The session titled Funding Opportunities for Political Scientists focused on Canadian, European and Québec-based research funding programs, drawing academics and doctoral candidates.

 

---

DAY 4  - 23 July 2014

Plenary – Carwyn Jones, First minister of Wales

On Wednesday morning, First Minister of Wales Carwyn Jones discussed the issues surrounding the Scottish referendum on independence and the future of the United Kingdom. Mr. Jones reminded the audience that there is no functional federalism in the UK implying a “balance of powers,” mostly because the states are subject to decisions made in Westminster and are not demographically and geographically alike. The UK, the First Minister cautioned, should not forget about federalism, and he argued that three key principles must be born in mind within the constitutional debate: respect for devoted legislature; parity of structures; and the evolution of executive and legislative competencies. Mr. Jones also mused about the logistical (a new Scottish flag, a name for the rest of the country), institutional and constitutional issues raised by an independent Scotland.

 

Award Session – Karl Deutsch Award

Before a full audience, Prof. Pippa Norris, this year’s recipient of the Karl Deutsch Award, presented a lecture titled When do elections fail and why does this matter? Through her research program (The Electoral Integrity Project), Pippa Norris explores the reasons why some elections are deemed failures (Thailand, Ukraine, Afghanistan), advancing various criteria for identifying failed or successful elections, including legitimacy and electoral integrity (political legitimacy / electoral participation, peaceful demonstration, violent protest, international norms).

Special Session – The MOOCs Challenge for Political Science

������2.0 is on its way! In collaboration with the ������Portal, managed by Mauro Calise at the University of Naples – Federica II, massive open online courses (MOOCs) were launched on Wednesday, thus following in the footsteps of such major institutions as Princeton and the London School of Economics. The main purpose of ������MOOCs is to offer courses geared to Global South students and professors in French, English and possibly Spanish, and to teach basic concepts of political science. Werner Patzelt, Giliberto Capano, Helen Milner and Guy Lachapelle discussed the future of online courses, and where ������should stand on this specific matter.

Session speciale – Vivr(e) l’humour politique

Est-ce que l’humour peut être politique? C’est la question à laquelle Christian Vanasse, Michel Garneau (Garnotte), Fred Dubé et Nabila ben Youssef ont tenté de répondre lors de cette session animée par Emmanuel Choquette. Tous ont répondu que l’humour est toujours politique, et que même discuter des rapports hommes-femmes, sous-entendent parfois des concepts patriarcaux. Ils ont estimé que leur rôle en tant qu’humoristes était de dénoncer, et parfois d’éduquer les gens sur des enjeux politiques auxquels ils ne se seraient pas intéressés auparavant. Christian Vanasse a d’ailleurs mentionné qu’il faisait de l’humour pour les militants, et que grâce è l’humour politique, il se sentait un peu moins colérique et plus « humain ». Ils ont toutefois souligné que l’humour politique est une responsabilité à double-tranchant, nécessitant de la nuance, de la recherche et du dosage. Michel Garneau a souligné qu’une distance physique et temporelle est parfois nécessaire avant de pouvoir rire d’un événement ou d’une situation tragique, tout en ajoutant qu’en humour, il ne faut pas avoir de tabou. La session suscita un intérêt important de la communauté médiatique, et fût organisée en collaboration avec l’École nationale de l’humour.

.
Blueberry Soup

Eileen Jerrett presented her documentary, Blueberry Soup, which concerns the emergence of the Icelandic “people’s movement” following the financial crisis of 2008, which saw citizens call for greater accountability from their leaders and bankers. This philosophical and artistic documentary argues that democracy “does not need strong leaders, but rather strong people who can think for themselves.” A Q&A session followed with the director, and audience members were invited to share their impressions and comments on the screening.

---

DAY 5 - 24 July 2014

Session spéciale – Jean Laponce et la science politique internationale

Lors de la dernière journée du congrès, une session spéciale a été dédiée à l’héritage de Jean Laponce et à l’apport de ses travaux sur la science politique internationale. Les intervenants présents ont souligné la carrière impressionnante de M. Laponce, ancient président de l’AISP de 1973 à 1976. Ils ont notamment soulevé que c’est de lui dont vient l’idée de mettre sur pied un journal pour l’AISP, et qu’il n’hésitait pas à intégrer d’autres disciplines dans ses recherches, notamment la géopolitique, au travers de ses champs d’expertise (partis politiques et référendums, éudes des politiques linguistiques etc.) Tel qu’ajouté par John E. Trent, “nothing was sacred for Jean Laponce”, et avec plus de 16 ouvrages et 140 articles, l’implication de Jean Laponce dans l’AISP et dans le domaine de la science politique en général en fait un acteur majeur dont la carrière se devait d’être célébrée.

Special Session – Political Science: Current Performance and Future Strengths

“Why do we study political science if we disdain politicians?” Such was the question tackled during a special session aimed at discussing the state of political science. Three topical issues were raised: 1) Its actual strength; 2) its relevance to society and politics; and 3) the impact of current politics on the discipline. Participants noted that political science was largely American-centric, as opposed to a more European focus. Each participant brought a regional perspective to bear on representations of political science, be it Russian, Australian or South African. Among the issues raised was the split between quantitative political science (USA) and qualitative political science (Australia, for example), with participants noting that efforts must be made to de-Americanize political science in order to make it relevant to the rest of the world. They also suggested that specialization should not lead to hermetic boundaries, and that in order for political science to remain relevant, intellectual snobbism must be avoided at all costs.

Council Meeting – Election of the 23rd ������Executive Committee

On Friday morning, the ������Council voted for the composition of the 23rd ������Executive Committee. After a very close vote, the following 16 persons were elected: Leonardo Avritzer (Brazil), Roman Baecker (Poland), Daniel Buquet (Uruguay), Linda Cardinal (Canada), Terrell Carver (UK), Jørgen Elklit (Denmark), Carlo Guarnieri (Italy), Rieko Kage (Japan), Marianne Kneuer (Germany), Dirk Kotzé (South Africa), Hatem M'Rad (Tunisia), Chan Wook Park (South Korea), Romain Pasquier (France), Dianne Pinderhughes(USA), Fusun Turkmen (Turkey) and Fernando Vallespin (Spain).

Closing Ceremony – 23^rd Congress of Political Science

������brought the curtain down on the 23rd Congress of Political Science with a series of speeches given by outgoing President Helen V. Milner, newly elected President Aija Tanaka, Secretary General Guy Lachapelle and Program Committee Chair Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot. Theresa Sasinska-Klas, Chair of the Committee on Prizes and Awards (COPA), recognized the prizes that were awarded during this year’s edition (Global South, Juan Linz, Wilma Rule, Stein Rokkan, Karl Deutsch). The Turkish ambassador also presented a speech inviting fellow participants to the next edition, which will be held in Istanbul in 2016. Former �ѴDzԳٰ�é���� LOC Chair Stéphane Paquin presented Fusun Turkmen, Chair of the Local Organizing Committee in Istanbul, with the official ������flag, thus bringing the 23rd World Congress of Political Science to a close.

Photos and Videos

Participation

• Participation - Volume 38, Number 1, December 2014
• Participation - Volume 37, Number 2, September 2013